Hmg Healthcare

PBJ Takeaway: Hmg Healthcare

33 Facilities2 States97% For-ProfitAvg. Overall Rating: 3.1Avg. Staffing Rating: 2.0Staffing Rating: 2.0

Hmg Healthcare operates 33 nursing homes across 2 states, with 97% classified as for-profit. Its average CMS overall rating is 3.1 stars.

Across the portfolio, facilities report an average of 3.40 total nurse HPRD, including 0.40 RN hours, below the national ratio of 3.77 HPRD.

30% of Hmg Healthcare facilities meet PBJ320 high-risk criteria (e.g. special focus facility, one-star overall, abuse icon). CMS reports a total of 47 fines ($1.8 million) for the chain's nursing homes.

320 Consulting

Hmg Healthcare Key Metrics

Providers

States

Avg. Rating

3.1

Total Fines

$1.8 million

– Hmg Healthcare

Special Focus Facilities (SFFs)

SFF Candidates

1-Star Overall

Cited for Abuse

Avg. CMS 5-Star Rating – Hmg Healthcare

Overall

3.1

Health Inspection

2.8

Staffing

2.0

Quality Measures

4.4

Hmg Healthcare Facilities

Nursing homes affiliated with this entity. Latest quarter staffing from CMS PBJ data. Click column headers to sort.

State	Provider	City	Total HPRD	RN HPRD	Overall Rating	Staffing Rating
KS	Smoky Hill Rehabilitation Center ⚠	Salina	2.17	0.43	1	1
TX	Park Manor of Quail Valley	Missouri City	3.31	0.22	2	2
TX	Accel at College Station ⚠	College Station	2.72	0.29	2	1
TX	Forum Parkway Health & Rehabilitation	Bedford	3.73	0.64	4	2
TX	Silver Spring	Abilene	3.31	0.59	2	2
TX	Treviso Transitional Care ⚠	Longview	3.45	0.29	1	2
TX	Pecan Bayou Nursing and Rehabilitation	Brownwood	3.47	0.57	4	4
TX	Park Manor of the Woodlands	The Woodlands	4.52	0.44	4	3
TX	Deerbrook Skilled Nursing and Rehab Center ⚠	Humble	3.40	0.37	1	2
TX	Hewitt Nursing and Rehabilitation ⚠	Hewitt	3.69	0.37	1	1
TX	Harbor Lakes Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	Granbury	3.56	0.40	5	3
TX	Crowley Nursing and Rehabilitation	Crowley	3.62	0.42	5	2
TX	Park Manor of Tomball ⚠	Tomball	2.98	0.28	1	1
TX	Stallings Court Nursing and Rehabilitation	Nacogdoches	3.41	0.52	5	2
TX	Green Oaks Nursing & Rehabilitation	Arlington	3.04	0.24	4	2
TX	Cimarron Place Health & Rehabilitation Center	Corpus Christi	3.54	0.47	4	2
TX	Park Manor of Westchase ⚠	Houston	3.23	0.36	1	1
KS	Tanglewood Nursing & Rehabilitation ⚠	Topeka	3.20	0.45	1	1
TX	Park Manor of Humble	Humble	3.11	0.38	4	2
TX	Park Manor of Cypress Station ⚠	Houston	2.94	0.36	1	1
TX	Arbrook Plaza	Arlington	3.58	0.37	4	1
TX	Park Manor of Conroe	Conroe	3.36	0.28	5	1
TX	Gulf Pointe Plaza	Rockport	3.14	0.23	5	2
TX	Park Manor of South Belt	Houston	3.40	0.67	4	3
TX	Park Manor of Cyfair	Houston	3.14	0.46	5	2
TX	Stonegate Nursing and Rehabilitation ⚠	Fort Worth	3.81	0.57	3	3
TX	Friendship Haven Healthcare and Rehabilitation Cen	Friendswood	3.54	0.36	4	2
TX	Holland Lake Rehabilitation and Wellness Center	Weatherford	3.79	0.38	5	3
TX	Red Oak Health and Rehabilitation Center	Red Oak	3.46	0.44	4	2
TX	Lone Star Rehabilitation & Wellness Center	Stephenville	3.08	0.63	4	3
TX	Mission Nursing & Rehabilitation Center	Mission	3.52	0.49	5	2
TX	Willowbrook Nursing Center	Nacogdoches	3.00	0.20	2	1
TX	Methodist Transitional Care Center-Desoto Llc	Desoto	4.45	0.57	2	3

1–20 of 33

Methodology

This dashboard uses CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) data (2017–2025), along with other public datasets (Provider Information, Affiliated Entity). State staffing standards via MACPAC (2022).

Metrics

Hours Per Resident Day (HPRD): Total staff hours ÷ average residents. Example: 350 hours for 100 residents = 3.5 HPRD.
Direct Care (excl. Admin, DON): Hours per resident day for direct care staff only (RN, LPN, CNA, NAtrn, MedAide), excluding administrative and supervisory roles.
Contract Staff %: Share of hours provided by contract staff.
Census: Average number of residents during the period.

Note: Some states set minimums (e.g., NJ, CA, NY at 3.5 HPRD); a federal 3.48 minimum was recently overturned (2025). A 2001 federal study linked 4.1 HPRD to better outcomes in that study. Staffing needs vary by resident acuity (case-mix), day, and shift. Estimates on PBJ Takeaway assume roughly 60% of staff are CNAs.

Data transparency

The PBJ Dashboard pulls directly from CMS data and is carefully vetted for accuracy. Still, sometimes a bug sneaks into the jelly. That could mean: a systemic CMS data reporting issue (e.g., Q2 2017 contract staffing, missing data in 2020 due to COVID) or there could be a coding error on our part. If you spot something that looks off, please let me know via the contact form so I can set things right.

Request custom PBJ analysis for litigation and investigative reporting.Request custom PBJ analysis.