Oregon PBJ Nursing Home StaffingOregon PBJ Staffing
120 providers • 6,912 residents • 5.00 HPRD
5.00 HPRD (rank: 2)5.00 HPRD · Rk 20.65 RN HPRD7.3% contract
Oregon's statewide staffing ratio is 5.00 HPRD in Q4 2025. Oregon's statewide staffing ratio is down slightly (−0.04) since Q4 2024. This level is above the national ratio of 3.76 HPRD and ranks #2 out of 51 states.
Oregon
Direct staff excludes Admin/DON. State min. (~2.46 HPRD) may reflect calculated equivalents by MACPAC. Direct staff excludes Admin/DON. State min. (~2.46 HPRD) may reflect calculated equivalents by MACPAC.
Oregon
Oregon
Oregon
OR Staffing Stats
| Metric | Oregon | CMS Region 10CMS Region 10 includes Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, and Washington.Regional figures are calculated from facility-level data using the same methodology as the state figures. | U.S. | State rankRanks compare the 50 states and D.C. by the displayed metric value. A higher or lower rank is not inherently positive or negative for every metric, including contract staffing share and rural-facility share. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Nurse Staffing HPRD | 5.00 | 4.41-0.58 vs OR | 3.76-1.24 vs OR | #2 of 51 |
| Direct Care Nurse HPRD | 4.70 | 4.11-0.59 vs OR | 3.50-1.20 vs OR | #2 of 51 |
| RN HPRD | 0.65 | 0.81+0.17 vs OR | 0.62-0.03 vs OR | #30 of 51 |
| RN Direct Care HPRD | 0.44 | 0.60+0.16 vs OR | 0.43Same as OR | #33 of 51 |
| Nurse Aide HPRD | 3.42 | 2.77-0.65 vs OR | 2.28-1.14 vs OR | #1 of 51 |
| Contract Staff Percentage | 7.3% | 5.4%-1.9 pts vs OR | 5.3%-2.0 pts vs OR | #15 of 51 |
| Median Case-Mix HPRD (Acuity) | 3.64 | 3.80+0.15 vs OR | 3.74+0.10 vs OR | #32 of 51 |
| Rural Facilities (Share) | 16% | 21%+5.0 pts vs OR | 27%+10.9 pts vs OR | #40 of 51 |
PBJ320 High-Risk (28)
PBJ320 high-risk PBJ320 high-risk uses CMS-assigned indicators only (PBJ320 does not assign them): Special Focus Facility or SFF Candidate; abuse icon; one-star overall; one-star staffing. nursing homes in Oregon (28 facilities).
| Facility | Census | CMS ratings | Indicators | Total HPRD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loading facilities… | ||||
Methodology
Staffing from CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) public files (2017–2025), plus Provider Information and chain data where shown. State staffing context via MACPAC (2022). Methodology · PBJ explained.
Metrics
- Hours Per Resident Day (HPRD): Total staff hours ÷ average residents. Example: 350 hours for 100 residents = 3.5 HPRD.
- Direct Care (excl. Admin, DON): Hours per resident day for direct care staff only (RN, LPN, CNA, NAtrn, MedAide), excluding administrative and supervisory roles.
- Contract Staff %: Share of hours provided by contract staff.
- Census: Average number of residents during the period.
Note: Some states set minimums (e.g., NJ, CA, NY at 3.5 HPRD); a federal 3.48 minimum was recently overturned (2025). A 2001 federal study linked 4.1 HPRD to better outcomes in that study. Staffing needs vary by resident acuity (case-mix), day, and shift. Estimates on PBJ Takeaway assume roughly 60% of staff are CNAs.
Data transparency
The PBJ Dashboard pulls directly from CMS data and is carefully vetted for accuracy. Still, sometimes a bug sneaks into the jelly. That could mean: a systemic CMS data reporting issue (e.g., Q2 2017 contract staffing, missing data in 2020 due to COVID) or there could be a coding error on our part. If you spot something that looks off, please let me know via the contact form so I can set things right.
Trend charts omit quarters with implausible submitted HPRD (total/direct below 0.25; RN, LPN, and aide use role floors and neighbor-quarter rules). Full criteria.
Rankings, within-state percentiles, CMS flags (including abuse icon): How metrics are calculated.