North Dakota PBJ Nursing Home StaffingNorth Dakota PBJ Staffing
69 providers • 4,420 residents • 4.59 HPRD
4.59 HPRD (rank: 3)4.59 HPRD · Rk 30.91 RN HPRD12.3% contract
North Dakota's statewide staffing ratio is 4.59 HPRD in Q4 2025. North Dakota's statewide staffing ratio is up slightly (+0.03) since Q4 2024. This level is above the national ratio of 3.76 HPRD and ranks #3 out of 51 states.
North Dakota
Direct staff excludes Admin/DON. Direct staff excludes Admin/DON.
North Dakota
North Dakota
North Dakota
ND Staffing Stats
| Metric | North Dakota | CMS Region 8CMS Region 8 includes Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming.Regional figures are calculated from facility-level data using the same methodology as the state figures. | U.S. | State rankRanks compare the 50 states and D.C. by the displayed metric value. A higher or lower rank is not inherently positive or negative for every metric, including contract staffing share and rural-facility share. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Nurse Staffing HPRD | 4.59 | 3.77-0.82 vs ND | 3.76-0.83 vs ND | #3 of 51 |
| Direct Care Nurse HPRD | 4.30 | 3.51-0.79 vs ND | 3.50-0.80 vs ND | #3 of 51 |
| RN HPRD | 0.91 | 0.84-0.06 vs ND | 0.62-0.29 vs ND | #8 of 51 |
| RN Direct Care HPRD | 0.64 | 0.63-0.01 vs ND | 0.43-0.20 vs ND | #11 of 51 |
| Nurse Aide HPRD | 3.14 | 2.35-0.79 vs ND | 2.28-0.86 vs ND | #3 of 51 |
| Contract Staff Percentage | 12.3% | 7.1%-5.2 pts vs ND | 5.3%-7.1 pts vs ND | #5 of 51 |
| Median Case-Mix HPRD (Acuity) | 3.39 | 3.50+0.11 vs ND | 3.74+0.35 vs ND | #45 of 51 |
| Rural Facilities (Share) | 67% | 46%-21.2 pts vs ND | 27%-39.4 pts vs ND | #8 of 51 |
PBJ320 High-Risk (20)
PBJ320 high-risk PBJ320 high-risk uses CMS-assigned indicators only (PBJ320 does not assign them): Special Focus Facility or SFF Candidate; abuse icon; one-star overall; one-star staffing. nursing homes in North Dakota (20 facilities).
| Facility | Census | CMS ratings | Indicators | Total HPRD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loading facilities… | ||||
Methodology
Staffing from CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) public files (2017–2025), plus Provider Information and chain data where shown. State staffing context via MACPAC (2022). Methodology · PBJ explained.
Metrics
- Hours Per Resident Day (HPRD): Total staff hours ÷ average residents. Example: 350 hours for 100 residents = 3.5 HPRD.
- Direct Care (excl. Admin, DON): Hours per resident day for direct care staff only (RN, LPN, CNA, NAtrn, MedAide), excluding administrative and supervisory roles.
- Contract Staff %: Share of hours provided by contract staff.
- Census: Average number of residents during the period.
Note: Some states set minimums (e.g., NJ, CA, NY at 3.5 HPRD); a federal 3.48 minimum was recently overturned (2025). A 2001 federal study linked 4.1 HPRD to better outcomes in that study. Staffing needs vary by resident acuity (case-mix), day, and shift. Estimates on PBJ Takeaway assume roughly 60% of staff are CNAs.
Data transparency
The PBJ Dashboard pulls directly from CMS data and is carefully vetted for accuracy. Still, sometimes a bug sneaks into the jelly. That could mean: a systemic CMS data reporting issue (e.g., Q2 2017 contract staffing, missing data in 2020 due to COVID) or there could be a coding error on our part. If you spot something that looks off, please let me know via the contact form so I can set things right.
Trend charts omit quarters with implausible submitted HPRD (total/direct below 0.25; RN, LPN, and aide use role floors and neighbor-quarter rules). Full criteria.
Rankings, within-state percentiles, CMS flags (including abuse icon): How metrics are calculated.