Montana PBJ Nursing Home StaffingMontana PBJ Staffing
59 providers • 3,293 residents • 3.78 HPRD
3.78 HPRD (rank: 30)3.78 HPRD · Rk 300.84 RN HPRD9.4% contract
Montana's statewide staffing ratio is 3.78 HPRD in Q4 2025. Montana's statewide staffing ratio is down slightly (−0.02) since Q4 2024. This level is near the national ratio of 3.76 HPRD and ranks #30 out of 51 states.
Montana
Direct staff excludes Admin/DON. State min. (~1.90 HPRD) may reflect calculated equivalents by MACPAC. Direct staff excludes Admin/DON. State min. (~1.90 HPRD) may reflect calculated equivalents by MACPAC.
Montana
Montana
Montana
MT Staffing Stats
| Metric | Montana | CMS Region 8CMS Region 8 includes Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming.Regional figures are calculated from facility-level data using the same methodology as the state figures. | U.S. | State rankRanks compare the 50 states and D.C. by the displayed metric value. A higher or lower rank is not inherently positive or negative for every metric, including contract staffing share and rural-facility share. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Nurse Staffing HPRD | 3.78 | 3.77-0.01 vs MT | 3.76-0.02 vs MT | #30 of 51 |
| Direct Care Nurse HPRD | 3.55 | 3.51-0.04 vs MT | 3.50-0.06 vs MT | #23 of 51 |
| RN HPRD | 0.84 | 0.84Same as MT | 0.62-0.23 vs MT | #11 of 51 |
| RN Direct Care HPRD | 0.66 | 0.63-0.04 vs MT | 0.43-0.23 vs MT | #9 of 51 |
| Nurse Aide HPRD | 2.41 | 2.35-0.05 vs MT | 2.28-0.12 vs MT | #21 of 51 |
| Contract Staff Percentage | 9.4% | 7.1%-2.3 pts vs MT | 5.3%-4.2 pts vs MT | #11 of 51 |
| Median Case-Mix HPRD (Acuity) | 3.37 | 3.50+0.12 vs MT | 3.74+0.37 vs MT | #46 of 51 |
| Rural Facilities (Share) | 69% | 46%-23.4 pts vs MT | 27%-41.6 pts vs MT | #6 of 51 |
PBJ320 High-Risk (21)
PBJ320 high-risk PBJ320 high-risk uses CMS-assigned indicators only (PBJ320 does not assign them): Special Focus Facility or SFF Candidate; abuse icon; one-star overall; one-star staffing. nursing homes in Montana (21 facilities).
| Facility | Census | CMS ratings | Indicators | Total HPRD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loading facilities… | ||||
Methodology
Staffing from CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) public files (2017–2025), plus Provider Information and chain data where shown. State staffing context via MACPAC (2022). Methodology · PBJ explained.
Metrics
- Hours Per Resident Day (HPRD): Total staff hours ÷ average residents. Example: 350 hours for 100 residents = 3.5 HPRD.
- Direct Care (excl. Admin, DON): Hours per resident day for direct care staff only (RN, LPN, CNA, NAtrn, MedAide), excluding administrative and supervisory roles.
- Contract Staff %: Share of hours provided by contract staff.
- Census: Average number of residents during the period.
Note: Some states set minimums (e.g., NJ, CA, NY at 3.5 HPRD); a federal 3.48 minimum was recently overturned (2025). A 2001 federal study linked 4.1 HPRD to better outcomes in that study. Staffing needs vary by resident acuity (case-mix), day, and shift. Estimates on PBJ Takeaway assume roughly 60% of staff are CNAs.
Data transparency
The PBJ Dashboard pulls directly from CMS data and is carefully vetted for accuracy. Still, sometimes a bug sneaks into the jelly. That could mean: a systemic CMS data reporting issue (e.g., Q2 2017 contract staffing, missing data in 2020 due to COVID) or there could be a coding error on our part. If you spot something that looks off, please let me know via the contact form so I can set things right.
Trend charts omit quarters with implausible submitted HPRD (total/direct below 0.25; RN, LPN, and aide use role floors and neighbor-quarter rules). Full criteria.
Rankings, within-state percentiles, CMS flags (including abuse icon): How metrics are calculated.