Idaho PBJ Nursing Home StaffingIdaho PBJ Staffing
79 providers • 4,394 residents • 3.92 HPRD
3.92 HPRD (rank: 20)3.92 HPRD · Rk 200.78 RN HPRD5.2% contract
Idaho's statewide staffing ratio is 3.92 HPRD in Q4 2025. Idaho's statewide staffing ratio is down slightly (−0.02) since Q4 2024. This level is above the national ratio of 3.76 HPRD and ranks #20 out of 51 states.
Idaho
Direct staff excludes Admin/DON. State min. (~2.46 HPRD) may reflect calculated equivalents by MACPAC. Direct staff excludes Admin/DON. State min. (~2.46 HPRD) may reflect calculated equivalents by MACPAC.
Idaho
Idaho
Idaho
ID Staffing Stats
| Metric | Idaho | CMS Region 10CMS Region 10 includes Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, and Washington.Regional figures are calculated from facility-level data using the same methodology as the state figures. | U.S. | State rankRanks compare the 50 states and D.C. by the displayed metric value. A higher or lower rank is not inherently positive or negative for every metric, including contract staffing share and rural-facility share. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Nurse Staffing HPRD | 3.92 | 4.41+0.50 vs ID | 3.76-0.16 vs ID | #20 of 51 |
| Direct Care Nurse HPRD | 3.65 | 4.11+0.46 vs ID | 3.50-0.15 vs ID | #19 of 51 |
| RN HPRD | 0.78 | 0.81+0.03 vs ID | 0.62-0.17 vs ID | #15 of 51 |
| RN Direct Care HPRD | 0.56 | 0.60+0.04 vs ID | 0.43-0.12 vs ID | #15 of 51 |
| Nurse Aide HPRD | 2.36 | 2.77+0.41 vs ID | 2.28-0.08 vs ID | #23 of 51 |
| Contract Staff Percentage | 5.2% | 5.4%+0.2 pts vs ID | 5.3%Same as ID | #30 of 51 |
| Median Case-Mix HPRD (Acuity) | 4.28 | 3.80-0.48 vs ID | 3.74-0.54 vs ID | #9 of 51 |
| Rural Facilities (Share) | 36% | 21%-14.8 pts vs ID | 27%-8.9 pts vs ID | #23 of 51 |
PBJ320 High-Risk (19)
PBJ320 high-risk PBJ320 high-risk uses CMS-assigned indicators only (PBJ320 does not assign them): Special Focus Facility or SFF Candidate; abuse icon; one-star overall; one-star staffing. nursing homes in Idaho (19 facilities).
| Facility | Census | CMS ratings | Indicators | Total HPRD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loading facilities… | ||||
Methodology
Staffing from CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) public files (2017–2025), plus Provider Information and chain data where shown. State staffing context via MACPAC (2022). Methodology · PBJ explained.
Metrics
- Hours Per Resident Day (HPRD): Total staff hours ÷ average residents. Example: 350 hours for 100 residents = 3.5 HPRD.
- Direct Care (excl. Admin, DON): Hours per resident day for direct care staff only (RN, LPN, CNA, NAtrn, MedAide), excluding administrative and supervisory roles.
- Contract Staff %: Share of hours provided by contract staff.
- Census: Average number of residents during the period.
Note: Some states set minimums (e.g., NJ, CA, NY at 3.5 HPRD); a federal 3.48 minimum was recently overturned (2025). A 2001 federal study linked 4.1 HPRD to better outcomes in that study. Staffing needs vary by resident acuity (case-mix), day, and shift. Estimates on PBJ Takeaway assume roughly 60% of staff are CNAs.
Data transparency
The PBJ Dashboard pulls directly from CMS data and is carefully vetted for accuracy. Still, sometimes a bug sneaks into the jelly. That could mean: a systemic CMS data reporting issue (e.g., Q2 2017 contract staffing, missing data in 2020 due to COVID) or there could be a coding error on our part. If you spot something that looks off, please let me know via the contact form so I can set things right.
Trend charts omit quarters with implausible submitted HPRD (total/direct below 0.25; RN, LPN, and aide use role floors and neighbor-quarter rules). Full criteria.
Rankings, within-state percentiles, CMS flags (including abuse icon): How metrics are calculated.