192 providers • 19,584 residents • 3.75 HPRD
3.75 HPRD (rank: 33)0.62 RN HPRD6.3% contractCT Min. ~3.06 HPRD
Connecticut reported 3.75 HPRD (≈ 6.4 residents per total staff) in Q3 2025. HPRD is up 0.07 since Q3 2024. This level is near the national ratio of 3.77 HPRD and ranks #33 out of 51 states.
Put another way… On a 30-bed floor at a typical Connecticut nursing home you'd see about 4.7 staff members, including 2.8 nurse aides. For the entire 102-resident facility (Connecticut average), that's about 15.9 total staff, including 9.6 nurse aides.
Connecticut
Direct staff excludes Admin/DON. State min. (~3.06 HPRD) may reflect calculated equivalents by MACPAC. Direct staff excludes Admin/DON. State min. (~3.06 HPRD) may reflect calculated equivalents by MACPAC.
Connecticut
Connecticut
Connecticut
| Metric | Value | National Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Total Nurse Staffing HPRD | 3.75 | #33 of 51 |
| Direct Care Nurse HPRD | 3.49 | #31 of 51 |
| RN HPRD | 0.62 | #33 of 51 |
| RN Direct Care HPRD | 0.40 | #37 of 51 |
| Nurse Aide HPRD | 2.26 | #35 of 51 |
| Contract Staff Percentage | 6.3% | — |
Connecticut has facilities in the Special Focus Facility program. Select a tab to view Current SFFs, Candidates, Graduates, or facilities no longer in Medicare/Medicaid.
| Facility | Months | Residents | Total HPRD | Ownership |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grandview Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center (New Britain) | 44 | 110 | 4.30 | For-Profit |
This dashboard uses CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) data (2017–2025), along with other public datasets (Provider Information, Affiliated Entity). State staffing standards via MACPAC (2022).
Metrics
Note: Some states set minimums (e.g., NJ, CA, NY at 3.5 HPRD); a federal 3.48 minimum was recently overturned (2025). A 2001 federal study linked 4.1 HPRD to better outcomes in that study. Staffing needs vary by resident acuity (case-mix), day, and shift. Estimates on PBJ Takeaway assume roughly 60% of staff are CNAs.
Data transparency
The PBJ Dashboard pulls directly from CMS data and is carefully vetted for accuracy. Still, sometimes a bug sneaks into the jelly. That could mean: a systemic CMS data reporting issue (e.g., Q2 2017 contract staffing, missing data in 2020 due to COVID) or there could be a coding error on our part. If you spot something that looks off, please let me know via the contact form so I can set things right.
Request custom PBJ analysis for litigation and investigative reporting.Request custom PBJ analysis.