PBJ320 Snapshot (Q1 2026)
CCN 676487

The Center at Parmer

Austin, TXFor ProfitVeritas Management Group
Phoebe J
PBJ Takeaway

The Center at Parmer reported 4.51 HPRD in Q1 2026. This level is around the CMS case-mix benchmark (4.35 HPRD) and in the top 5% of Texas nursing homes.

Total HPRD
  • Q2 2025: 4.41
  • Q3 2025: 4.50
  • Q4 2025: 4.68
  • Q1 2026: 4.51
Residents75Avg daily census
CMS ratings
Overall:★★★★★
Staffing:Staff:★★★
CMS case-mix4.35HPRD
RN0.69HPRD
Nurse aide2.20HPRD

Details

Total Staffing: The Center at Parmer
Total Staffing

The Center at Parmer

Direct staff excludes Admin/DON. State minimums via MACPAC (2022) may reflect calculated HPRD equivalents. Direct staff excludes Admin/DON. State minimums via MACPAC may reflect calculated HPRD equivalents.

CMS Case-Mix (Q1 2026)

Case-Mix by Position

CMS case-mix is an acuity metric based on PDPM. It is not a state or federal minimum; the ratio is a reference point, not a measure of whether staffing is sufficient. based on PDPM. It is not a state or federal minimum; the ratio is a reference point, not a measure of whether staffing is sufficient.

RN Staffing: The Center at Parmer
RN Staffing

The Center at Parmer

Census: The Center at Parmer
Census

The Center at Parmer

Contract Staff %: The Center at Parmer
Contract Staff %

The Center at Parmer

Ownership3 parties

Center at Parmer, LLC

CMS owner data roles and percentages are reported filings, not proof of who operates the facility or care quality.CMS owner filings; not proof of who operates.

NameTypeRoleSince
Veritas Management Group LLCOrganization100% ownership interest; Operational/managerial controlAssociated in CMS since 10/9/2017100%Org.Ops controlAssociated in CMS since 10/9/2017Organization100% ownership interest; Operational/managerial control10/9/2017
Julie L KellyIndividualOperational/managerial controlAssociated in CMS since 9/16/2019Ops controlInd.Associated in CMS since 9/16/2019IndividualOperational/managerial control9/16/2019
Kenneth BunchIndividual4.0% ownership interest; Corporate officerAssociated in CMS since 9/15/20194.0%Ind.Corporate officerAssociated in CMS since 9/15/2019Individual4.0% ownership interest; Corporate officer9/15/2019
How these figures are calculatedMethods, definitions, and data sources

Staffing from CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) public files (2017–2026), plus Provider Information and chain data where shown. State staffing context via MACPAC (2022). Methodology · PBJ explained.

Metrics

  • Hours Per Resident Day (HPRD): Total staff hours ÷ average residents. Example: 350 hours for 100 residents = 3.5 HPRD.
  • Direct Care (excl. Admin, DON): Hours per resident day for direct care staff only (RN, LPN, CNA, NAtrn, MedAide), excluding administrative and supervisory roles.
  • Contract Staff %: Share of hours provided by contract staff.
  • Census: Average number of residents during the period.

Note: Some states set minimums (e.g., NJ, CA, NY at 3.5 HPRD); a federal 3.48 minimum was recently overturned (2025). A 2001 federal study linked 4.1 HPRD to better outcomes in that study. Staffing needs vary by resident acuity (case-mix), day, and shift. Estimates on PBJ Takeaway assume roughly 60% of staff are CNAs.

Data transparency

The PBJ Dashboard pulls directly from CMS data and is carefully vetted for accuracy. Still, sometimes a bug sneaks into the jelly. That could mean: a systemic CMS data reporting issue (e.g., Q2 2017 contract staffing, missing data in 2020 due to COVID) or there could be a coding error on our part. If you spot something that looks off, please let me know via the contact form so I can set things right.

Trend charts omit quarters with implausible submitted HPRD (total/direct below 0.25; RN, LPN, and aide use role floors and neighbor-quarter rules). Full criteria.

Rankings, within-state percentiles, CMS flags (including abuse icon): How metrics are calculated.