6 Facilities1 States100% For-ProfitAvg. Overall Rating: 1.5Avg. Staffing Rating: 1.8Staffing Rating: 1.8
Advena Living Communities operates 6 nursing homes across 1 state, all classified as for-profit. Its average CMS overall rating is 1.5 stars.
Across the portfolio, facilities report an average of 3.20 total nurse HPRD, including 0.40 RN hours, below the national ratio of 3.77 HPRD.
67% of Advena Living Communities facilities meet PBJ320 high-riskPBJ320 assigns nursing homes as high-risk when CMS designates them as: Special Focus Facility (SFF), SFF candidate, 1-star overall rating, or with an abuse icon. criteria (e.g. special focus facility, one-star overall, abuse icon). CMS reports a total of 9 fines ($395,978) for the chain's nursing homes.
Nursing homes affiliated with this entity. Latest quarter staffing from CMS PBJ data. Click column headers to sort.
| State | Provider | City | Total HPRD | RN HPRD | Overall Rating | Staffing Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KS | Legacy on 10th Avenue 1 star | Topeka | 3.03 | 0.45 | 1 | 2 |
| KS | Advena Living at Fountainview | Rose Hill | 3.38 | 0.41 | 3 | 2 |
| KS | Advena Living of Cherryvale | Cherryvale | 3.91 | 0.63 | 2 | 4 |
| KS | Bonner Springs Nursing & Rehab Center 1 star | Bonner Springs | 2.86 | 0.26 | 1 | 1 |
| KS | Orchard Gardens 1 star | Wichita | 2.63 | 0.35 | 1 | 1 |
| KS | Clearwater Nursing & Rehabilitation Center Abuse, 1 star, SFF Candidate | Clearwater | 3.50 | 0.30 | 1 | 1 |
This dashboard uses CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) data (2017–2025), along with other public datasets (Provider Information, Affiliated Entity). State staffing standards via MACPAC (2022).
Metrics
Note: Some states set minimums (e.g., NJ, CA, NY at 3.5 HPRD); a federal 3.48 minimum was recently overturned (2025). A 2001 federal study linked 4.1 HPRD to better outcomes in that study. Staffing needs vary by resident acuity (case-mix), day, and shift. Estimates on PBJ Takeaway assume roughly 60% of staff are CNAs.
Data transparency
The PBJ Dashboard pulls directly from CMS data and is carefully vetted for accuracy. Still, sometimes a bug sneaks into the jelly. That could mean: a systemic CMS data reporting issue (e.g., Q2 2017 contract staffing, missing data in 2020 due to COVID) or there could be a coding error on our part. If you spot something that looks off, please let me know via the contact form so I can set things right.
Request custom PBJ analysis for litigation and investigative reporting.Request custom PBJ analysis.