Slp Operations

PBJ Takeaway: Slp Operations

22 Facilities2 States90% For-ProfitAvg. Overall Rating: 2.7Avg. Staffing Rating: 2.0Staffing Rating: 2.0

Slp Operations operates 22 nursing homes across 2 states, with 90% classified as for-profit. Its average CMS overall rating is 2.7 stars.

Across the portfolio, facilities report an average of 3.20 total nurse HPRD, including 0.40 RN hours, below the national ratio of 3.77 HPRD.

36% of Slp Operations facilities meet PBJ320 high-risk criteria (e.g. special focus facility, one-star overall, abuse icon). CMS reports a total of 45 fines ($2.0 million) for the chain's nursing homes.

320 Consulting

Slp Operations Key Metrics

Providers ⓘ

States

Avg. Rating

2.7

Total Fines

$2.0 million

– Slp Operations

Special Focus Facilities (SFFs)

SFF Candidates

1-Star Overall

Cited for Abuse

Avg. CMS 5-Star Rating – Slp Operations

Overall

2.7

Health Inspection

2.7

Staffing

2.0

Quality Measures

3.9

Slp Operations Facilities

Nursing homes affiliated with this entity. Latest quarter staffing from CMS PBJ data. Click column headers to sort.

State	Provider	City	Total HPRD	RN HPRD	Overall Rating	Staffing Rating
OK	Tulsa Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare	Tulsa	4.25	0.15	3	3
TX	Paris Healthcare Center	Paris	3.20	0.60	3	4
TX	Avir at Arbor Terrace ⚠	San Angelo	3.24	0.23	1	1
TX	Diboll Nursing and Rehab	Diboll	3.92	0.67	3	4
TX	Mansfield Nursing & Rehabilitation Center	Mansfield	3.25	0.30	2	3
TX	Garland Nursing and Rehabilitation ⚠	Garland	3.25	0.33	1	1
TX	Oak Manor of Commerce Nursing and Rehabilitation	Commerce	2.94	0.30	2	1
TX	Avir at Coronado	Abilene	3.05	0.24	2	2
TX	Avir at Adams ⚠	Temple	2.93	0.25	1	2
TX	Heritage Oaks Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	Lubbock	3.30	0.25	4	2
TX	The Oaks at Radford Hills Healthcare Center ⚠	Abilene	2.79	0.25	2	1
TX	Willis Nursing and Rehabilitation Lp	Willis	3.10	0.39	5	2
TX	Woodland Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation ⚠	Conroe	2.88	0.25	1	1
TX	Seabreeze Nursing and Rehabilitation ⚠	Texas City	3.50	0.34	1	2
TX	Avir at Burleson	Burleson	2.66	0.17	3	1
TX	Trinity Nursing & Rehab of Granbury ⚠	Granbury	3.07	0.43	1	1
TX	Llano Nursing and Rehabilitation Center ⚠	Llano	3.26	0.44	1	1
TX	River Valley Health & Rehabilitation Center	Gainesville	2.69	0.29	3	1
TX	Avir at Carthage	Carthage	3.24	0.34	2	3
TX	Sweetwater Healthcare Center	Sweetwater	2.51	0.35	4	1
TX	Lynwood Nursing and Rehabilitation	Levelland	2.97	0.36	3	1
TX	Avir at Knox City	Knox City	3.21	0.27	4	3

1–20 of 22

Methodology

This dashboard uses CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) data (2017–2025), along with other public datasets (Provider Information, Affiliated Entity). State staffing standards via MACPAC (2022).

Metrics

Hours Per Resident Day (HPRD): Total staff hours ÷ average residents. Example: 350 hours for 100 residents = 3.5 HPRD.
Direct Care (excl. Admin, DON): Hours per resident day for direct care staff only (RN, LPN, CNA, NAtrn, MedAide), excluding administrative and supervisory roles.
Contract Staff %: Share of hours provided by contract staff.
Census: Average number of residents during the period.

Note: Some states set minimums (e.g., NJ, CA, NY at 3.5 HPRD); a federal 3.48 minimum was recently overturned (2025). A 2001 federal study linked 4.1 HPRD to better outcomes in that study. Staffing needs vary by resident acuity (case-mix), day, and shift. Estimates on PBJ Takeaway assume roughly 60% of staff are CNAs.

Data transparency

The PBJ Dashboard pulls directly from CMS data and is carefully vetted for accuracy. Still, sometimes a bug sneaks into the jelly. That could mean: a systemic CMS data reporting issue (e.g., Q2 2017 contract staffing, missing data in 2020 due to COVID) or there could be a coding error on our part. If you spot something that looks off, please let me know via the contact form so I can set things right.

Request custom PBJ analysis for litigation and investigative reporting.Request custom PBJ analysis.