Aventura Health Group

Phoebe J
PBJ Takeaway: Aventura Health Group

12 Facilities3 States100% For-ProfitAvg. Overall Rating: 1.9Avg. Staffing Rating: 2.1Staffing Rating: 2.1

Aventura Health Group operates 12 nursing homes across 3 states, all classified as for-profit. Its average CMS overall rating is 1.9 stars.

Across the portfolio, facilities report an average of 3.30 total nurse HPRD, including 0.40 RN hours, below the national ratio of 3.77 HPRD.

50% of Aventura Health Group facilities meet PBJ320 high-riskPBJ320 assigns nursing homes as high-risk when CMS designates them as: Special Focus Facility (SFF), SFF candidate, 1-star overall rating, or with an abuse icon. criteria (e.g. special focus facility, one-star overall, abuse icon). CMS reports a total of 13 fines ($1.2 million) for the chain's nursing homes.

320 Consulting
Aventura Health Group Key Metrics
Providers
12
States
3
Avg. Rating
1.9
Total Fines
$1.2 million
High-Risk FacilitiesPBJ320 assigns nursing homes as high-risk when CMS designates them as: Special Focus Facility (SFF), SFF candidate, 1-star overall rating, or with an abuse icon. – Aventura Health Group
Special Focus Facilities (SFFs)
1
SFF Candidates
2
1-Star Overall
5
Cited for Abuse
2
Avg. CMS 5-Star Rating – Aventura Health Group
Overall
1.9
Health Inspection
1.7
Staffing
2.1
Quality Measures
3.6
Aventura Health Group Facilities

Nursing homes affiliated with this entity. Latest quarter staffing from CMS PBJ data. Click column headers to sort.

StateProviderCityTotal HPRDRN HPRDOverall RatingStaffing Rating
FLAventura at the Bay SFFSaint Petersburg3.510.55
OHAventura at West ParkCincinnati3.580.4523
OHAventura at Walton HillsWalton Hills3.120.4032
OHAventura at Assumption VillageNorth Lima3.220.3923
OHAventura at Carriage InnDayton3.170.3032
OHAventura at Oakwood Village 1 starSpringfield3.480.4011
OHAventura at Humility HouseAustintown3.220.4133
OHAventura at Shiloh SpringsTrotwood2.940.2721
PAAventura at Pembrooke 1 starWest Chester3.420.4012
PAAventura at Prospect 1 starProspect Park3.390.2212
PAAventura at Terrace View Abuse, 1 star, SFF CandidatePeckville11
PAAventura at Creekside Abuse, 1 star, SFF CandidateCarbondale3.550.4713
Methodology

This dashboard uses CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) data (2017–2025), along with other public datasets (Provider Information, Affiliated Entity). State staffing standards via MACPAC (2022).

Metrics

  • Hours Per Resident Day (HPRD): Total staff hours ÷ average residents. Example: 350 hours for 100 residents = 3.5 HPRD.
  • Direct Care (excl. Admin, DON): Hours per resident day for direct care staff only (RN, LPN, CNA, NAtrn, MedAide), excluding administrative and supervisory roles.
  • Contract Staff %: Share of hours provided by contract staff.
  • Census: Average number of residents during the period.

Note: Some states set minimums (e.g., NJ, CA, NY at 3.5 HPRD); a federal 3.48 minimum was recently overturned (2025). A 2001 federal study linked 4.1 HPRD to better outcomes in that study. Staffing needs vary by resident acuity (case-mix), day, and shift. Estimates on PBJ Takeaway assume roughly 60% of staff are CNAs.

Data transparency

The PBJ Dashboard pulls directly from CMS data and is carefully vetted for accuracy. Still, sometimes a bug sneaks into the jelly. That could mean: a systemic CMS data reporting issue (e.g., Q2 2017 contract staffing, missing data in 2020 due to COVID) or there could be a coding error on our part. If you spot something that looks off, please let me know via the contact form so I can set things right.

Request custom PBJ analysis for litigation and investigative reporting.Request custom PBJ analysis.