Stonegate Senior Living

Phoebe J
PBJ Takeaway: Stonegate Senior Living

24 Facilities2 States60% For-ProfitAvg. Overall Rating: 2.5Avg. Staffing Rating: 2.2Staffing Rating: 2.2

Stonegate Senior Living operates 24 nursing homes across 2 states, with 60% classified as for-profit. Its average CMS overall rating is 2.5 stars.

Across the portfolio, facilities report an average of 3.30 total nurse HPRD, including 0.30 RN hours, below the national ratio of 3.77 HPRD.

50% of Stonegate Senior Living facilities meet PBJ320 high-riskPBJ320 assigns nursing homes as high-risk when CMS designates them as: Special Focus Facility (SFF), SFF candidate, 1-star overall rating, or with an abuse icon. criteria (e.g. special focus facility, one-star overall, abuse icon). CMS reports a total of 38 fines ($1.3 million) for the chain's nursing homes.

320 Consulting
Stonegate Senior Living Key Metrics
Providers Provider roster shows 24 facilities; CMS chain performance file lists 25.
24
States
2
Avg. Rating
2.5
Total Fines
$1.3 million
High-Risk FacilitiesPBJ320 assigns nursing homes as high-risk when CMS designates them as: Special Focus Facility (SFF), SFF candidate, 1-star overall rating, or with an abuse icon. – Stonegate Senior Living
Special Focus Facilities (SFFs)
0
SFF Candidates
0
1-Star Overall
9
Cited for Abuse
5
Avg. CMS 5-Star Rating – Stonegate Senior Living
Overall
2.5
Health Inspection
2.2
Staffing
2.2
Quality Measures
4.1
Stonegate Senior Living Facilities

Nursing homes affiliated with this entity. Latest quarter staffing from CMS PBJ data. Click column headers to sort.

StateProviderCityTotal HPRDRN HPRDOverall RatingStaffing Rating
OKRanchwood Nursing Center 1 starYukon3.350.2512
OKNoble Health Care Center Abuse, 1 starNoble3.400.2212
TXThe Villages on Macarthur AbuseIrving3.350.4733
TXAccel at Willow BendPlano3.500.3321
TXGarnet Hill Rehabilitation and Skilled CareWylie3.450.6124
TXProvidence Park Rehabilitation and Skilled NursingTyler3.450.4833
TXThe Plaza at LubbockLubbock3.130.2432
TXBaybrooke Village Care and Rehab CenterMckinney3.250.5842
TXBriarcliff Skilled Nursing FacilityCarthage3.410.4034
TXSettlers Ridge Care CenterCelina3.170.2342
TXHeritage Plaza Nursing Center AbuseTexarkana2.980.4221
TXReunion Plaza Senior Care and Rehabilitation Cente 1 starTexarkana3.400.3911
TXColonial Pines Healthcare CenterSan Augustine3.250.2332
TXPine Grove Nursing CenterCenter3.290.3642
OKAccel at Crystal Park 1 starOklahoma City3.790.3312
OKMedical Park West Rehabilitation & Skilled Care 1 star, SFF CandidateNorman3.670.2913
OKThe Villages at Southern HillsTulsa4.040.3253
OKMontevista Rehabilitation and Skilled Care 1 starLawton3.450.1711
OKTuscany Village Nursing Center 1 starOklahoma City3.130.1611
OKGarland Road Nursing & Rehab Center 1 star, SFF CandidateEnid2.890.3012
OKHighland Park Health Care AbuseOkmulgee3.500.2423
OKTulsa Nursing CenterTulsa3.200.1853
OKMeadowlake Estates 1 starOklahoma City3.510.2413
TXSimpson PlaceDallas2.980.3432

1–20 of 24

Methodology

This dashboard uses CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) data (2017–2025), along with other public datasets (Provider Information, Affiliated Entity). State staffing standards via MACPAC (2022).

Metrics

  • Hours Per Resident Day (HPRD): Total staff hours ÷ average residents. Example: 350 hours for 100 residents = 3.5 HPRD.
  • Direct Care (excl. Admin, DON): Hours per resident day for direct care staff only (RN, LPN, CNA, NAtrn, MedAide), excluding administrative and supervisory roles.
  • Contract Staff %: Share of hours provided by contract staff.
  • Census: Average number of residents during the period.

Note: Some states set minimums (e.g., NJ, CA, NY at 3.5 HPRD); a federal 3.48 minimum was recently overturned (2025). A 2001 federal study linked 4.1 HPRD to better outcomes in that study. Staffing needs vary by resident acuity (case-mix), day, and shift. Estimates on PBJ Takeaway assume roughly 60% of staff are CNAs.

Data transparency

The PBJ Dashboard pulls directly from CMS data and is carefully vetted for accuracy. Still, sometimes a bug sneaks into the jelly. That could mean: a systemic CMS data reporting issue (e.g., Q2 2017 contract staffing, missing data in 2020 due to COVID) or there could be a coding error on our part. If you spot something that looks off, please let me know via the contact form so I can set things right.

Request custom PBJ analysis for litigation and investigative reporting.Request custom PBJ analysis.