Cambridge Healthcare Services

PBJ Takeaway: Cambridge Healthcare Services

32 Facilities1 States100% For-ProfitAvg. Overall Rating: 2.7Avg. Staffing Rating: 3.0Staffing Rating: 3.0

Cambridge Healthcare Services operates 32 nursing homes across 1 state, all classified as for-profit. Its average CMS overall rating is 2.7 stars.

Across the portfolio, facilities report an average of 4.00 total nurse HPRD, including 0.40 RN hours, above the national ratio of 3.77 HPRD.

22% of Cambridge Healthcare Services facilities meet PBJ320 high-risk criteria (e.g. special focus facility, one-star overall, abuse icon). CMS reports a total of 33 fines ($1.3 million) for the chain's nursing homes.

320 Consulting

Cambridge Healthcare Services Key Metrics

Providers

States

Avg. Rating

2.7

Total Fines

$1.3 million

– Cambridge Healthcare Services

Special Focus Facilities (SFFs)

SFF Candidates

1-Star Overall

Cited for Abuse

Avg. CMS 5-Star Rating – Cambridge Healthcare Services

Overall

2.7

Health Inspection

2.4

Staffing

3.0

Quality Measures

3.9

Cambridge Healthcare Services Facilities

Nursing homes affiliated with this entity. Latest quarter staffing from CMS PBJ data. Click column headers to sort.

State	Provider	City	Total HPRD	RN HPRD	Overall Rating	Staffing Rating
CA	Madera Rehabilitation & Nursing Center	Madera	3.92	0.60	2	3
CA	Watsonville Nursing Center	Watsonville	4.03	0.61	3	4
CA	Glendale Healthcare Center	Glendale	4.07	0.37	5	3
CA	Anaheim Crest Nursing Center	Anaheim	4.18	0.47	5	3
CA	Rancho Mirage Health and Rehabilitation Center	Rancho Mirage	4.17	0.32	3	3
CA	Professional Post Acute Center	San Rafael	3.84	0.54	2	4
CA	Lynwood Post Acute Care Center	Lynwood	3.86	0.28	2	3
CA	Mountain View Conv Hosp	Sylmar	4.50	0.59	2	3
CA	Lassen Nursing & Rehabilitation Center	Susanville	3.70	0.45	2	2
CA	Briarcrest Nursing Center ⚠	Bell Gardens	4.30	0.49	1	2
CA	Broadway Healthcare Center	San Gabriel	3.81	0.31	4	2
CA	Casitas Care Center	Granada Hills	3.87	0.30	2	3
CA	Laguna Hills Health and Rehabilitation Center ⚠	Laguna Hills	4.12	0.41	1	3
CA	Seal Beach Health and Rehabilitation Center ⚠	Seal Beach	4.10	0.30	1	3
CA	West Covina Healthcare Center	West Covina	4.08	0.38	3	3
CA	Watsonville Post Acute Center	Watsonville	4.09	0.63	4	4
CA	Country Manor La Mesa Healthcare Center	La Mesa	4.04	0.52	4	4
CA	Rinaldi Convalescent Hospital	Granada Hills	3.95	0.44	2	3
CA	Sunray Healthcare Center ⚠	Los Angeles	4.72	0.53	—	—
CA	Modesto Post Acute Center	Modesto	3.93	0.73	5	4
CA	Monte Vista Healthcare Center	Duarte	4.06	0.33	2	2
CA	Harbor Villa Care Center	Anaheim	3.93	0.33	2	3
CA	Ontario Healthcare Center	Ontario	3.73	0.32	4	2
CA	Highland Care Center of Redlands	Redlands	4.06	0.33	3	2
CA	Glendale Post Acute Center ⚠	Glendale	3.87	0.35	1	2
CA	Buena Vista Care Center	Anaheim	3.94	0.41	3	3
CA	Huntington Drive Health and Rehabilitation Center	Arcadia	3.92	0.32	3	4
CA	Monrovia Gardens Healthcare Center ⚠	Monrovia	4.24	0.43	1	2
CA	Valley Palms Care Center ⚠	N Hollywood	4.10	0.43	1	3
CA	La Sierra Care Center	Merced	3.91	0.37	3	3
CA	Merced Nursing & Rehabilitation Ctr	Merced	4.17	0.55	4	4
CA	Murrieta Health and Rehabilitation Center	Murrieta	4.23	0.30	2	3

1–20 of 32

Methodology

This dashboard uses CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) data (2017–2025), along with other public datasets (Provider Information, Affiliated Entity). State staffing standards via MACPAC (2022).

Metrics

Hours Per Resident Day (HPRD): Total staff hours ÷ average residents. Example: 350 hours for 100 residents = 3.5 HPRD.
Direct Care (excl. Admin, DON): Hours per resident day for direct care staff only (RN, LPN, CNA, NAtrn, MedAide), excluding administrative and supervisory roles.
Contract Staff %: Share of hours provided by contract staff.
Census: Average number of residents during the period.

Note: Some states set minimums (e.g., NJ, CA, NY at 3.5 HPRD); a federal 3.48 minimum was recently overturned (2025). A 2001 federal study linked 4.1 HPRD to better outcomes in that study. Staffing needs vary by resident acuity (case-mix), day, and shift. Estimates on PBJ Takeaway assume roughly 60% of staff are CNAs.

Data transparency

The PBJ Dashboard pulls directly from CMS data and is carefully vetted for accuracy. Still, sometimes a bug sneaks into the jelly. That could mean: a systemic CMS data reporting issue (e.g., Q2 2017 contract staffing, missing data in 2020 due to COVID) or there could be a coding error on our part. If you spot something that looks off, please let me know via the contact form so I can set things right.

Request custom PBJ analysis for litigation and investigative reporting.Request custom PBJ analysis.