Rmg Capital Partners

Phoebe J
PBJ Takeaway: Rmg Capital Partners

9 Facilities1 States100% For-ProfitAvg. Overall Rating: 2.8Avg. Staffing Rating: 2.5Staffing Rating: 2.5

Rmg Capital Partners operates 9 nursing homes across 1 state, all classified as for-profit. Its average CMS overall rating is 2.8 stars.

Across the portfolio, facilities report an average of 3.90 total nurse HPRD, including 0.30 RN hours, above the national ratio of 3.77 HPRD.

33% of Rmg Capital Partners facilities meet PBJ320 high-riskPBJ320 assigns nursing homes as high-risk when CMS designates them as: Special Focus Facility (SFF), SFF candidate, 1-star overall rating, or with an abuse icon. criteria (e.g. special focus facility, one-star overall, abuse icon). CMS reports a total of 20 fines ($331,858) for the chain's nursing homes.

320 Consulting
Rmg Capital Partners Key Metrics
Providers
9
States
1
Avg. Rating
2.8
Total Fines
$331,858
High-Risk FacilitiesPBJ320 assigns nursing homes as high-risk when CMS designates them as: Special Focus Facility (SFF), SFF candidate, 1-star overall rating, or with an abuse icon. – Rmg Capital Partners
Special Focus Facilities (SFFs)
1
SFF Candidates
1
1-Star Overall
2
Cited for Abuse
3
Avg. CMS 5-Star Rating – Rmg Capital Partners
Overall
2.8
Health Inspection
2.5
Staffing
2.5
Quality Measures
3.1
Rmg Capital Partners Facilities

Nursing homes affiliated with this entity. Latest quarter staffing from CMS PBJ data. Click column headers to sort.

StateProviderCityTotal HPRDRN HPRDOverall RatingStaffing Rating
CACalifornia Post-Acute Care Abuse, 1 star, SFF CandidateLynwood4.000.3413
CAMain West Postacute CareTurlock3.790.4343
CACeres Postacute CareCeres3.880.1933
CANorthvine Postacute Care Abuse, 1 star, SFF CandidateSanta Rosa3.670.3112
CANorthgate Postacute CareSan Rafael4.000.2322
CARiverside Postacute Care SFFRiverside4.100.37
CANorth Starr Postacute CareTurlock4.180.4643
CAFresno Postacute CareFresno3.780.3122
CACamden Postacute Care, IncCampbell3.740.2232
Methodology

This dashboard uses CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) data (2017–2025), along with other public datasets (Provider Information, Affiliated Entity). State staffing standards via MACPAC (2022).

Metrics

  • Hours Per Resident Day (HPRD): Total staff hours ÷ average residents. Example: 350 hours for 100 residents = 3.5 HPRD.
  • Direct Care (excl. Admin, DON): Hours per resident day for direct care staff only (RN, LPN, CNA, NAtrn, MedAide), excluding administrative and supervisory roles.
  • Contract Staff %: Share of hours provided by contract staff.
  • Census: Average number of residents during the period.

Note: Some states set minimums (e.g., NJ, CA, NY at 3.5 HPRD); a federal 3.48 minimum was recently overturned (2025). A 2001 federal study linked 4.1 HPRD to better outcomes in that study. Staffing needs vary by resident acuity (case-mix), day, and shift. Estimates on PBJ Takeaway assume roughly 60% of staff are CNAs.

Data transparency

The PBJ Dashboard pulls directly from CMS data and is carefully vetted for accuracy. Still, sometimes a bug sneaks into the jelly. That could mean: a systemic CMS data reporting issue (e.g., Q2 2017 contract staffing, missing data in 2020 due to COVID) or there could be a coding error on our part. If you spot something that looks off, please let me know via the contact form so I can set things right.

Request custom PBJ analysis for litigation and investigative reporting.Request custom PBJ analysis.