7 Facilities1 States14% For-ProfitAvg. Overall Rating: 1.1Avg. Staffing Rating: 1.0Staffing Rating: 1.0
Casa Consulting operates 7 nursing homes across 1 state, with 14% classified as for-profit. Its average CMS overall rating is 1.1 stars.
Staffing averages are not available for this chain for the latest quarter.
100% of Casa Consulting facilities meet PBJ320 high-riskPBJ320 assigns nursing homes as high-risk when CMS designates them as: Special Focus Facility (SFF), SFF candidate, 1-star overall rating, or with an abuse icon. criteria (e.g. special focus facility, one-star overall, abuse icon). CMS reports a total of 6 fines ($70,338) for the chain's nursing homes.
Nursing homes affiliated with this entity. Latest quarter staffing from CMS PBJ data. Click column headers to sort.
| State | Provider | City | Total HPRD | RN HPRD | Overall Rating | Staffing Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IN | Munster Med-Inn Abuse, 1 star, SFF Candidate | Munster | — | — | 1 | 1 |
| IN | Dyer Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 1 star | Dyer | — | — | 1 | 1 |
| IN | Casa of Hobart 1 star, SFF Candidate | Hobart | — | — | 1 | 1 |
| IN | Crown Point Health Campus 1 star, SFF Candidate | Crown Point | — | — | 1 | 1 |
| IN | Lincolnshire Health & Rehabilitation Center 1 star | Merrillville | — | — | 1 | 1 |
| IN | Harbor Health & Rehab SFF Candidate | East Chicago | — | — | 2 | 1 |
| IN | Spring Mill Health Campus 1 star | Merrillville | — | — | 1 | 1 |
This dashboard uses CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) data (2017–2025), along with other public datasets (Provider Information, Affiliated Entity). State staffing standards via MACPAC (2022).
Metrics
Note: Some states set minimums (e.g., NJ, CA, NY at 3.5 HPRD); a federal 3.48 minimum was recently overturned (2025). A 2001 federal study linked 4.1 HPRD to better outcomes in that study. Staffing needs vary by resident acuity (case-mix), day, and shift. Estimates on PBJ Takeaway assume roughly 60% of staff are CNAs.
Data transparency
The PBJ Dashboard pulls directly from CMS data and is carefully vetted for accuracy. Still, sometimes a bug sneaks into the jelly. That could mean: a systemic CMS data reporting issue (e.g., Q2 2017 contract staffing, missing data in 2020 due to COVID) or there could be a coding error on our part. If you spot something that looks off, please let me know via the contact form so I can set things right.
Request custom PBJ analysis for litigation and investigative reporting.Request custom PBJ analysis.