Casa Consulting

Phoebe J
PBJ Takeaway: Casa Consulting

7 Facilities1 States14% For-ProfitAvg. Overall Rating: 1.1Avg. Staffing Rating: 1.0Staffing Rating: 1.0

Casa Consulting operates 7 nursing homes across 1 state, with 14% classified as for-profit. Its average CMS overall rating is 1.1 stars.

Staffing averages are not available for this chain for the latest quarter.

100% of Casa Consulting facilities meet PBJ320 high-riskPBJ320 assigns nursing homes as high-risk when CMS designates them as: Special Focus Facility (SFF), SFF candidate, 1-star overall rating, or with an abuse icon. criteria (e.g. special focus facility, one-star overall, abuse icon). CMS reports a total of 6 fines ($70,338) for the chain's nursing homes.

320 Consulting
Casa Consulting Key Metrics
Providers
7
States
1
Avg. Rating
1.1
Total Fines
$70,338
High-Risk FacilitiesPBJ320 assigns nursing homes as high-risk when CMS designates them as: Special Focus Facility (SFF), SFF candidate, 1-star overall rating, or with an abuse icon. – Casa Consulting
Special Focus Facilities (SFFs)
0
SFF Candidates
4
1-Star Overall
6
Cited for Abuse
0
Avg. CMS 5-Star Rating – Casa Consulting
Overall
1.1
Health Inspection
1.1
Staffing
1.0
Quality Measures
3.3
Casa Consulting Facilities

Nursing homes affiliated with this entity. Latest quarter staffing from CMS PBJ data. Click column headers to sort.

StateProviderCityTotal HPRDRN HPRDOverall RatingStaffing Rating
INMunster Med-Inn Abuse, 1 star, SFF CandidateMunster11
INDyer Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 1 starDyer11
INCasa of Hobart 1 star, SFF CandidateHobart11
INCrown Point Health Campus 1 star, SFF CandidateCrown Point11
INLincolnshire Health & Rehabilitation Center 1 starMerrillville11
INHarbor Health & Rehab SFF CandidateEast Chicago21
INSpring Mill Health Campus 1 starMerrillville11
Methodology

This dashboard uses CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) data (2017–2025), along with other public datasets (Provider Information, Affiliated Entity). State staffing standards via MACPAC (2022).

Metrics

  • Hours Per Resident Day (HPRD): Total staff hours ÷ average residents. Example: 350 hours for 100 residents = 3.5 HPRD.
  • Direct Care (excl. Admin, DON): Hours per resident day for direct care staff only (RN, LPN, CNA, NAtrn, MedAide), excluding administrative and supervisory roles.
  • Contract Staff %: Share of hours provided by contract staff.
  • Census: Average number of residents during the period.

Note: Some states set minimums (e.g., NJ, CA, NY at 3.5 HPRD); a federal 3.48 minimum was recently overturned (2025). A 2001 federal study linked 4.1 HPRD to better outcomes in that study. Staffing needs vary by resident acuity (case-mix), day, and shift. Estimates on PBJ Takeaway assume roughly 60% of staff are CNAs.

Data transparency

The PBJ Dashboard pulls directly from CMS data and is carefully vetted for accuracy. Still, sometimes a bug sneaks into the jelly. That could mean: a systemic CMS data reporting issue (e.g., Q2 2017 contract staffing, missing data in 2020 due to COVID) or there could be a coding error on our part. If you spot something that looks off, please let me know via the contact form so I can set things right.

Request custom PBJ analysis for litigation and investigative reporting.Request custom PBJ analysis.