Bayshire Senior Communities

Phoebe J
PBJ Takeaway: Bayshire Senior Communities

12 Facilities1 States92% For-ProfitAvg. Overall Rating: 3.1Avg. Staffing Rating: 2.2Staffing Rating: 2.2

Bayshire Senior Communities operates 12 nursing homes across 1 state, with 92% classified as for-profit. Its average CMS overall rating is 3.1 stars.

Across the portfolio, facilities report an average of 4.30 total nurse HPRD, including 0.50 RN hours, above the national ratio of 3.77 HPRD.

17% of Bayshire Senior Communities facilities meet PBJ320 high-riskPBJ320 assigns nursing homes as high-risk when CMS designates them as: Special Focus Facility (SFF), SFF candidate, 1-star overall rating, or with an abuse icon. criteria (e.g. special focus facility, one-star overall, abuse icon). CMS reports a total of 47 fines ($730,720) for the chain's nursing homes.

320 Consulting
Bayshire Senior Communities Key Metrics
Providers
12
States
1
Avg. Rating
3.1
Total Fines
$730,720
High-Risk FacilitiesPBJ320 assigns nursing homes as high-risk when CMS designates them as: Special Focus Facility (SFF), SFF candidate, 1-star overall rating, or with an abuse icon. – Bayshire Senior Communities
Special Focus Facilities (SFFs)
0
SFF Candidates
1
1-Star Overall
2
Cited for Abuse
1
Avg. CMS 5-Star Rating – Bayshire Senior Communities
Overall
3.1
Health Inspection
2.6
Staffing
2.2
Quality Measures
4.4
Bayshire Senior Communities Facilities

Nursing homes affiliated with this entity. Latest quarter staffing from CMS PBJ data. Click column headers to sort.

StateProviderCityTotal HPRDRN HPRDOverall RatingStaffing Rating
CAVineyard Care CenterReedley3.890.4042
CACornerstone Care CenterSanger3.760.5122
CAMorning Star Post AcuteClovis3.990.4932
CAMajestic Mountain Care Center 1 star, SFF CandidateOakhurst3.420.3311
CAEl Centro Post-Acute CareEl Centro3.910.2332
CASanta Fe Post-Acute 1 starVista11
CABayshire San Dimas Post-AcuteSan Dimas4.360.6033
CABayshire CarlsbadCarlsbad5.281.0053
CABayshire Torrey Pines Post-AcuteSan Diego5.050.7843
CABayshire Yorba Linda Post-AcuteYorba Linda4.930.6443
CABayshire Rancho MirageRancho Mirage4.610.4642
CAStonehaven Senior LivingFresno
Methodology

This dashboard uses CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) data (2017–2025), along with other public datasets (Provider Information, Affiliated Entity). State staffing standards via MACPAC (2022).

Metrics

  • Hours Per Resident Day (HPRD): Total staff hours ÷ average residents. Example: 350 hours for 100 residents = 3.5 HPRD.
  • Direct Care (excl. Admin, DON): Hours per resident day for direct care staff only (RN, LPN, CNA, NAtrn, MedAide), excluding administrative and supervisory roles.
  • Contract Staff %: Share of hours provided by contract staff.
  • Census: Average number of residents during the period.

Note: Some states set minimums (e.g., NJ, CA, NY at 3.5 HPRD); a federal 3.48 minimum was recently overturned (2025). A 2001 federal study linked 4.1 HPRD to better outcomes in that study. Staffing needs vary by resident acuity (case-mix), day, and shift. Estimates on PBJ Takeaway assume roughly 60% of staff are CNAs.

Data transparency

The PBJ Dashboard pulls directly from CMS data and is carefully vetted for accuracy. Still, sometimes a bug sneaks into the jelly. That could mean: a systemic CMS data reporting issue (e.g., Q2 2017 contract staffing, missing data in 2020 due to COVID) or there could be a coding error on our part. If you spot something that looks off, please let me know via the contact form so I can set things right.

Request custom PBJ analysis for litigation and investigative reporting.Request custom PBJ analysis.