Shlomo Rechnitz

PBJ Takeaway: Shlomo Rechnitz

16 Facilities1 States100% For-ProfitAvg. Overall Rating: 2.3Avg. Staffing Rating: 2.6Staffing Rating: 2.6

Shlomo Rechnitz operates 16 nursing homes across 1 state, all classified as for-profit. Its average CMS overall rating is 2.3 stars.

Across the portfolio, facilities report an average of 4.10 total nurse HPRD, including 0.40 RN hours, above the national ratio of 3.77 HPRD.

56% of Shlomo Rechnitz facilities meet PBJ320 high-risk criteria (e.g. special focus facility, one-star overall, abuse icon). CMS reports a total of 32 fines ($948,099) for the chain's nursing homes.

320 Consulting

Shlomo Rechnitz Key Metrics

Providers

States

Avg. Rating

2.3

Total Fines

$948,099

– Shlomo Rechnitz

Special Focus Facilities (SFFs)

SFF Candidates

1-Star Overall

Cited for Abuse

Avg. CMS 5-Star Rating – Shlomo Rechnitz

Overall

2.3

Health Inspection

2.2

Staffing

2.6

Quality Measures

3.8

Shlomo Rechnitz Facilities

Nursing homes affiliated with this entity. Latest quarter staffing from CMS PBJ data. Click column headers to sort.

State	Provider	City	Total HPRD	RN HPRD	Overall Rating	Staffing Rating
CA	Eureka Rehabilitation & Wellness Center, Lp ⚠	Eureka	3.83	0.23	1	1
CA	Pavilion on Pico Healthcare & Wellness Centre, Lp	Los Angeles	4.15	0.53	4	3
CA	Seaview Rehabilitation & Wellness Center, Lp	Eureka	4.06	0.46	3	2
CA	Overland Terrace Healthcare & Wellness Centre, Lp	Los Angeles	4.21	0.27	3	3
CA	Chico Terrace Care Center	Chico	4.22	0.36	2	3
CA	Autumn Creek Post Acute ⚠	Chico	4.30	0.43	1	3
CA	East Terrace Rehabilitation & Wellness Centre, Lp ⚠	Los Angeles	4.10	0.37	1	3
CA	River Valley Healthcare & Wellness Centre, Lp	Redding	4.66	0.45	3	3
CA	Bay Marina Post Acute ⚠	Oakland	3.89	0.38	1	1
CA	The Rehabilitation Center of North Hills ⚠	North Hills	4.58	0.81	1	3
CA	The Rehabilitation Center on Pico ⚠	Los Angeles	4.10	0.40	1	4
CA	Los Feliz Healthcare & Wellness Center, Lp ⚠	Los Angeles	3.86	0.36	1	2
CA	North Point Healthcare & Wellness Centre Lp	Fresno	3.92	0.60	5	3
CA	Delta Healthcare & Wellness Center, Lp	Visalia	4.35	0.29	5	2
CA	Anaheim Point ⚠	Anaheim	3.85	0.59	1	3
CA	Mar Vista Country Villa Healthcare & Wellness ⚠	Los Angeles	4.30	0.27	2	2

Methodology

This dashboard uses CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) data (2017–2025), along with other public datasets (Provider Information, Affiliated Entity). State staffing standards via MACPAC (2022).

Metrics

Hours Per Resident Day (HPRD): Total staff hours ÷ average residents. Example: 350 hours for 100 residents = 3.5 HPRD.
Direct Care (excl. Admin, DON): Hours per resident day for direct care staff only (RN, LPN, CNA, NAtrn, MedAide), excluding administrative and supervisory roles.
Contract Staff %: Share of hours provided by contract staff.
Census: Average number of residents during the period.

Note: Some states set minimums (e.g., NJ, CA, NY at 3.5 HPRD); a federal 3.48 minimum was recently overturned (2025). A 2001 federal study linked 4.1 HPRD to better outcomes in that study. Staffing needs vary by resident acuity (case-mix), day, and shift. Estimates on PBJ Takeaway assume roughly 60% of staff are CNAs.

Data transparency

The PBJ Dashboard pulls directly from CMS data and is carefully vetted for accuracy. Still, sometimes a bug sneaks into the jelly. That could mean: a systemic CMS data reporting issue (e.g., Q2 2017 contract staffing, missing data in 2020 due to COVID) or there could be a coding error on our part. If you spot something that looks off, please let me know via the contact form so I can set things right.

Request custom PBJ analysis for litigation and investigative reporting.Request custom PBJ analysis.