Wisconsin Illinois Senior Housing, Inc.

Phoebe J
PBJ Takeaway: Wisconsin Illinois Senior Housing, Inc.

7 Facilities2 States0% For-ProfitAvg. Overall Rating: 1.9Avg. Staffing Rating: 3.9Staffing Rating: 3.9

Wisconsin Illinois Senior Housing, Inc. operates 7 nursing homes across 2 states, with 0% classified as for-profit. Its average CMS overall rating is 1.9 stars.

Across the portfolio, facilities report an average of 5.00 total nurse HPRD, including 0.90 RN hours, above the national ratio of 3.77 HPRD.

57% of Wisconsin Illinois Senior Housing, Inc. facilities meet PBJ320 high-riskPBJ320 assigns nursing homes as high-risk when CMS designates them as: Special Focus Facility (SFF), SFF candidate, 1-star overall rating, or with an abuse icon. criteria (e.g. special focus facility, one-star overall, abuse icon). CMS reports a total of 12 fines ($658,655) for the chain's nursing homes.

320 Consulting
Wisconsin Illinois Senior Housing, Inc. Key Metrics
Providers
7
States
2
Avg. Rating
1.9
Total Fines
$658,655
High-Risk FacilitiesPBJ320 assigns nursing homes as high-risk when CMS designates them as: Special Focus Facility (SFF), SFF candidate, 1-star overall rating, or with an abuse icon. – Wisconsin Illinois Senior Housing, Inc.
Special Focus Facilities (SFFs)
0
SFF Candidates
0
1-Star Overall
4
Cited for Abuse
1
Avg. CMS 5-Star Rating – Wisconsin Illinois Senior Housing, Inc.
Overall
1.9
Health Inspection
1.9
Staffing
3.9
Quality Measures
3.3
Wisconsin Illinois Senior Housing, Inc. Facilities

Nursing homes affiliated with this entity. Latest quarter staffing from CMS PBJ data. Click column headers to sort.

StateProviderCityTotal HPRDRN HPRDOverall RatingStaffing Rating
ILFair Oaks Health Care CenterCrystal Lake4.981.4744
WIEdgerton Care Center, IncEdgerton5.300.8224
WIIngleside Manor 1 star, SFF CandidateMount Horeb4.731.0914
WIHolton ManorElkhorn4.330.8644
WIEast Troy Manor 1 starEast Troy4.680.6414
WIGeneva Lake Manor 1 starLake Geneva4.950.5613
WIMontello Care Center Abuse, 1 starMontello6.050.8014
Methodology

This dashboard uses CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) data (2017–2025), along with other public datasets (Provider Information, Affiliated Entity). State staffing standards via MACPAC (2022).

Metrics

  • Hours Per Resident Day (HPRD): Total staff hours ÷ average residents. Example: 350 hours for 100 residents = 3.5 HPRD.
  • Direct Care (excl. Admin, DON): Hours per resident day for direct care staff only (RN, LPN, CNA, NAtrn, MedAide), excluding administrative and supervisory roles.
  • Contract Staff %: Share of hours provided by contract staff.
  • Census: Average number of residents during the period.

Note: Some states set minimums (e.g., NJ, CA, NY at 3.5 HPRD); a federal 3.48 minimum was recently overturned (2025). A 2001 federal study linked 4.1 HPRD to better outcomes in that study. Staffing needs vary by resident acuity (case-mix), day, and shift. Estimates on PBJ Takeaway assume roughly 60% of staff are CNAs.

Data transparency

The PBJ Dashboard pulls directly from CMS data and is carefully vetted for accuracy. Still, sometimes a bug sneaks into the jelly. That could mean: a systemic CMS data reporting issue (e.g., Q2 2017 contract staffing, missing data in 2020 due to COVID) or there could be a coding error on our part. If you spot something that looks off, please let me know via the contact form so I can set things right.

Request custom PBJ analysis for litigation and investigative reporting.Request custom PBJ analysis.