Plantation Management Company

Phoebe J
PBJ Takeaway: Plantation Management Company

16 Facilities1 States100% For-ProfitAvg. Overall Rating: 1.4Avg. Staffing Rating: 1.3Staffing Rating: 1.3

Plantation Management Company operates 16 nursing homes across 1 state, all classified as for-profit. Its average CMS overall rating is 1.4 stars.

Across the portfolio, facilities report an average of 3.30 total nurse HPRD, including 0.10 RN hours, below the national ratio of 3.77 HPRD.

69% of Plantation Management Company facilities meet PBJ320 high-riskPBJ320 assigns nursing homes as high-risk when CMS designates them as: Special Focus Facility (SFF), SFF candidate, 1-star overall rating, or with an abuse icon. criteria (e.g. special focus facility, one-star overall, abuse icon). CMS reports a total of 19 fines ($1.3 million) for the chain's nursing homes.

320 Consulting
Plantation Management Company Key Metrics
Providers
16
States
1
Avg. Rating
1.4
Total Fines
$1.3 million
High-Risk FacilitiesPBJ320 assigns nursing homes as high-risk when CMS designates them as: Special Focus Facility (SFF), SFF candidate, 1-star overall rating, or with an abuse icon. – Plantation Management Company
Special Focus Facilities (SFFs)
0
SFF Candidates
1
1-Star Overall
11
Cited for Abuse
3
Avg. CMS 5-Star Rating – Plantation Management Company
Overall
1.4
Health Inspection
2.1
Staffing
1.3
Quality Measures
1.8
Plantation Management Company Facilities

Nursing homes affiliated with this entity. Latest quarter staffing from CMS PBJ data. Click column headers to sort.

StateProviderCityTotal HPRDRN HPRDOverall RatingStaffing Rating
LAChateau Living Center 1 starKenner3.070.1011
LAJefferson Healthcare Center 1 starJefferson3.280.1211
LASt Joseph of Harahan 1 starHarahan3.400.1011
LACentral Guest House Healthcare & Rehabilitation CeBaton Rouge3.450.1632
LASterling Place Healthcare & Rehabilitation CenterBaton Rouge3.470.1922
LAFlannery Oaks Guest House 1 starBaton Rouge3.110.1411
LAHarvest Manor Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center Abuse, 1 star, SFF CandidateDenham Springs3.450.1611
LAGolden Age Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center Abuse, 1 starDenham Springs3.360.1211
LAHeritage Healthcare of Hammond 1 starHammond3.290.1311
LAThe Oaks Care CenterPineville3.160.1221
LAOuachita Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center 1 starMonroe3.250.1311
LAColonial Oaks Living CenterMetairie3.300.1432
LAThe Guest House Care Center 1 starBaton Rouge3.130.1411
LAValley View Health Care Facility Abuse, 1 starMarksville3.530.2412
LAPointe Coupee Healthcare 1 starNew Roads3.210.1511
LALady of the Oaks Retirement ManorLafayette3.560.1631
Methodology

This dashboard uses CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) data (2017–2025), along with other public datasets (Provider Information, Affiliated Entity). State staffing standards via MACPAC (2022).

Metrics

  • Hours Per Resident Day (HPRD): Total staff hours ÷ average residents. Example: 350 hours for 100 residents = 3.5 HPRD.
  • Direct Care (excl. Admin, DON): Hours per resident day for direct care staff only (RN, LPN, CNA, NAtrn, MedAide), excluding administrative and supervisory roles.
  • Contract Staff %: Share of hours provided by contract staff.
  • Census: Average number of residents during the period.

Note: Some states set minimums (e.g., NJ, CA, NY at 3.5 HPRD); a federal 3.48 minimum was recently overturned (2025). A 2001 federal study linked 4.1 HPRD to better outcomes in that study. Staffing needs vary by resident acuity (case-mix), day, and shift. Estimates on PBJ Takeaway assume roughly 60% of staff are CNAs.

Data transparency

The PBJ Dashboard pulls directly from CMS data and is carefully vetted for accuracy. Still, sometimes a bug sneaks into the jelly. That could mean: a systemic CMS data reporting issue (e.g., Q2 2017 contract staffing, missing data in 2020 due to COVID) or there could be a coding error on our part. If you spot something that looks off, please let me know via the contact form so I can set things right.

Request custom PBJ analysis for litigation and investigative reporting.Request custom PBJ analysis.