Aperion Care

Phoebe J
PBJ Takeaway: Aperion Care

33 Facilities2 States100% For-ProfitAvg. Overall Rating: 2.1Avg. Staffing Rating: 1.7Staffing Rating: 1.7

Aperion Care operates 33 nursing homes across 2 states, all classified as for-profit. Its average CMS overall rating is 2.1 stars.

Across the portfolio, facilities report an average of 3.10 total nurse HPRD, including 0.60 RN hours, below the national ratio of 3.77 HPRD.

64% of Aperion Care facilities meet PBJ320 high-riskPBJ320 assigns nursing homes as high-risk when CMS designates them as: Special Focus Facility (SFF), SFF candidate, 1-star overall rating, or with an abuse icon. criteria (e.g. special focus facility, one-star overall, abuse icon). CMS reports a total of 73 fines ($2.6 million) for the chain's nursing homes.

320 Consulting
Aperion Care Key Metrics
Providers
33
States
2
Avg. Rating
2.1
Total Fines
$2.6 million
High-Risk FacilitiesPBJ320 assigns nursing homes as high-risk when CMS designates them as: Special Focus Facility (SFF), SFF candidate, 1-star overall rating, or with an abuse icon. – Aperion Care
Special Focus Facilities (SFFs)
1
SFF Candidates
4
1-Star Overall
17
Cited for Abuse
5
Avg. CMS 5-Star Rating – Aperion Care
Overall
2.1
Health Inspection
2.3
Staffing
1.7
Quality Measures
3.3
Aperion Care Facilities

Nursing homes affiliated with this entity. Latest quarter staffing from CMS PBJ data. Click column headers to sort.

StateProviderCityTotal HPRDRN HPRDOverall RatingStaffing Rating
ILAperion Care Chicago Heights AbuseChicago Heights2.020.3821
ILAperion Care MidlothianMidlothian2.930.6321
INAperion Care Marion Llc Abuse, 1 starMarion3.360.4211
INAperion Care PeruPeru3.680.4542
INAperion Care SummerfieldCloverdale2.630.4452
INAperion Care Tolleston Park 1 starGary3.160.3011
INAperion Care Demotte 1 starDemotte2.740.5311
INAperion Care Monroe 1 starBloomington2.990.5111
INAperion Care Greenfield 1 starGreenfield2.930.3711
INAperion Care Hanover 1 starHanover3.600.5312
INAperion Care Arbors Michigan City SFFMichigan City3.280.39
INAperion Care KokomoKokomo3.320.4331
INAperion Care Vincennes 1 star, SFF CandidateVincennes3.220.4711
ILAperion Care International Abuse, 1 starChicago2.930.4011
ILAperion Care NilesNiles2.820.5352
ILAperion Care Forest Park Abuse, 1 star, SFF CandidateForest Park3.370.6411
ILAperion Care Burbank 1 starBurbank3.480.9411
ILAperion Care Oak Lawn Abuse, 1 starOak Lawn3.140.6111
ILAlta Rehab at WaucondaWauconda3.721.0643
ILAperion Care DoltonDolton3.330.4131
ILAlta Rehab at Fairmont AbuseChicago3.910.8922
ILPark Ridge Healthcare Center AbusePark Ridge2.920.6022
ILAperion Care West Chicago Abuse, 1 starWest Chicago1.690.4512
ILAperion Care ElginElgin2.930.8232
ILAperion Care WestchesterWestchester2.900.6232
ILAperion Care WesleyChicago4.130.8223
ILAlta Rehab at Oak BrookOak Brook4.421.2924
ILAperion Care Fox RiverElgin3.341.1953
ILAperion Care Wilmington Abuse, 1 starWilmington2.180.5311
ILAperion Care Dekalb 1 starDekalb3.070.9712
ILArcadia Care Morton 1 starMorton2.420.3111
ILAperion Care Lakeshore Abuse, 1 starChicago2.550.3111
INAperion Care Lincoln 1 star, SFF CandidateEvansville4.391.1113

1–20 of 33

Methodology

This dashboard uses CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) data (2017–2025), along with other public datasets (Provider Information, Affiliated Entity). State staffing standards via MACPAC (2022).

Metrics

  • Hours Per Resident Day (HPRD): Total staff hours ÷ average residents. Example: 350 hours for 100 residents = 3.5 HPRD.
  • Direct Care (excl. Admin, DON): Hours per resident day for direct care staff only (RN, LPN, CNA, NAtrn, MedAide), excluding administrative and supervisory roles.
  • Contract Staff %: Share of hours provided by contract staff.
  • Census: Average number of residents during the period.

Note: Some states set minimums (e.g., NJ, CA, NY at 3.5 HPRD); a federal 3.48 minimum was recently overturned (2025). A 2001 federal study linked 4.1 HPRD to better outcomes in that study. Staffing needs vary by resident acuity (case-mix), day, and shift. Estimates on PBJ Takeaway assume roughly 60% of staff are CNAs.

Data transparency

The PBJ Dashboard pulls directly from CMS data and is carefully vetted for accuracy. Still, sometimes a bug sneaks into the jelly. That could mean: a systemic CMS data reporting issue (e.g., Q2 2017 contract staffing, missing data in 2020 due to COVID) or there could be a coding error on our part. If you spot something that looks off, please let me know via the contact form so I can set things right.

Request custom PBJ analysis for litigation and investigative reporting.Request custom PBJ analysis.