Lme Family Holdings

PBJ Takeaway: Lme Family Holdings

15 Facilities4 States100% For-ProfitAvg. Overall Rating: 2.3Avg. Staffing Rating: 2.7Staffing Rating: 2.7

Lme Family Holdings operates 15 nursing homes across 4 states, all classified as for-profit. Its average CMS overall rating is 2.3 stars.

Across the portfolio, facilities report an average of 3.40 total nurse HPRD, including 0.60 RN hours, below the national ratio of 3.77 HPRD.

33% of Lme Family Holdings facilities meet PBJ320 high-risk criteria (e.g. special focus facility, one-star overall, abuse icon). CMS reports a total of 28 fines ($714,475) for the chain's nursing homes.

320 Consulting

Lme Family Holdings Key Metrics

Providers

States

Avg. Rating

2.3

Total Fines

$714,475

– Lme Family Holdings

Special Focus Facilities (SFFs)

SFF Candidates

1-Star Overall

Cited for Abuse

Avg. CMS 5-Star Rating – Lme Family Holdings

Overall

2.3

Health Inspection

2.2

Staffing

2.7

Quality Measures

3.2

Lme Family Holdings Facilities

Nursing homes affiliated with this entity. Latest quarter staffing from CMS PBJ data. Click column headers to sort.

State	Provider	City	Total HPRD	RN HPRD	Overall Rating	Staffing Rating
MA	Lafayette Rehabilitation & Skilled Nursing	Marblehead	4.35	0.66	5	4
MA	Fairhaven Healthcare Center	Lowell	3.52	0.28	2	3
MI	Cherry Hill for Nursing and Rehabilitation	Westland	3.00	0.47	3	2
NE	Monument Rehabilitation and Care Center ⚠	Scottsbluff	3.78	0.33	1	2
PA	Valley Manor Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center	Coopersburg	2.91	0.68	2	3
PA	Rose City Nursing and Rehab at Lancaster	Lancaster	3.25	0.61	2	3
PA	Rosemont Center	Rosemont	3.25	0.44	2	1
PA	Harborview Rehabilitation and Care Center at Lansd ⚠	Lansdale	3.38	0.65	1	4
PA	Harborview Rehabilitation Care Center at Doylestow ⚠	Doylestown	3.52	0.75	1	3
PA	Phoenix Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing,the	Phoenixville	3.47	0.44	2	3
PA	Holland Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing	Holland	4.26	1.19	3	3
PA	Forest City Nursing and Rehab Center	Forest City	3.09	0.63	2	1
PA	Fairlane Gardens Nursing and Rehab at Reading	Reading	3.16	0.48	3	3
PA	Liberty Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing ⚠	Philadelphia	3.02	0.53	3	2
PA	Wyndmoor Hills Rehabilitation and Nursing Center ⚠	Wyndmoor	3.32	0.54	1	2

Methodology

This dashboard uses CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) data (2017–2025), along with other public datasets (Provider Information, Affiliated Entity). State staffing standards via MACPAC (2022).

Metrics

Hours Per Resident Day (HPRD): Total staff hours ÷ average residents. Example: 350 hours for 100 residents = 3.5 HPRD.
Direct Care (excl. Admin, DON): Hours per resident day for direct care staff only (RN, LPN, CNA, NAtrn, MedAide), excluding administrative and supervisory roles.
Contract Staff %: Share of hours provided by contract staff.
Census: Average number of residents during the period.

Note: Some states set minimums (e.g., NJ, CA, NY at 3.5 HPRD); a federal 3.48 minimum was recently overturned (2025). A 2001 federal study linked 4.1 HPRD to better outcomes in that study. Staffing needs vary by resident acuity (case-mix), day, and shift. Estimates on PBJ Takeaway assume roughly 60% of staff are CNAs.

Data transparency

The PBJ Dashboard pulls directly from CMS data and is carefully vetted for accuracy. Still, sometimes a bug sneaks into the jelly. That could mean: a systemic CMS data reporting issue (e.g., Q2 2017 contract staffing, missing data in 2020 due to COVID) or there could be a coding error on our part. If you spot something that looks off, please let me know via the contact form so I can set things right.

Request custom PBJ analysis for litigation and investigative reporting.Request custom PBJ analysis.