Focused Post Acute Care Partners

Phoebe J
PBJ Takeaway: Focused Post Acute Care Partners

25 Facilities1 States96% For-ProfitAvg. Overall Rating: 2.2Avg. Staffing Rating: 1.6Staffing Rating: 1.6

Focused Post Acute Care Partners operates 25 nursing homes across 1 state, with 96% classified as for-profit. Its average CMS overall rating is 2.2 stars.

Across the portfolio, facilities report an average of 3.10 total nurse HPRD, including 0.30 RN hours, below the national ratio of 3.77 HPRD.

48% of Focused Post Acute Care Partners facilities meet PBJ320 high-riskPBJ320 assigns nursing homes as high-risk when CMS designates them as: Special Focus Facility (SFF), SFF candidate, 1-star overall rating, or with an abuse icon. criteria (e.g. special focus facility, one-star overall, abuse icon). CMS reports a total of 47 fines ($2.5 million) for the chain's nursing homes.

320 Consulting
Focused Post Acute Care Partners Key Metrics
Providers
25
States
1
Avg. Rating
2.2
Total Fines
$2.5 million
High-Risk FacilitiesPBJ320 assigns nursing homes as high-risk when CMS designates them as: Special Focus Facility (SFF), SFF candidate, 1-star overall rating, or with an abuse icon. – Focused Post Acute Care Partners
Special Focus Facilities (SFFs)
0
SFF Candidates
2
1-Star Overall
10
Cited for Abuse
6
Avg. CMS 5-Star Rating – Focused Post Acute Care Partners
Overall
2.2
Health Inspection
2.1
Staffing
1.6
Quality Measures
4.2
Focused Post Acute Care Partners Facilities

Nursing homes affiliated with this entity. Latest quarter staffing from CMS PBJ data. Click column headers to sort.

StateProviderCityTotal HPRDRN HPRDOverall RatingStaffing Rating
TXFocused Care of Waxahachie 1 starWaxahachie2.660.1911
TXFocused Care at Fort StocktonFort Stockton2.810.2021
TXFocused Care at Cedar Bayou Abuse, 1 star, SFF CandidateBaytown3.050.3411
TXFocused Care at WestwoodHouston3.020.2431
TXFocused Care at Orange 1 starOrange3.390.2112
TXFocused Care at Pasadena 1 starPasadena2.920.4811
TXFocused Care at MidlandMidland3.320.4323
TXFocused Care at CraneCrane3.210.2742
TXFocused Care at Hogan ParkMidland2.930.4621
TXFocused Care at Burnet BayBaytown2.750.3232
TXFocused Care at Webster Abuse, 1 starWebster3.630.4412
TXFocused Care at Odessa 1 starOdessa3.070.3011
TXFocused Care of GilmerGilmer2.810.3121
TXFocused Care at Mount Pleasant Abuse, 1 starMount Pleasant3.190.6012
TXFocused Care at HuntsvilleHuntsville2.440.3941
TXFocused Care of Center AbuseCenter3.440.3122
TXFocused Care at Linden 1 star, SFF CandidateLinden2.680.6112
TXFocused Care at HamiltonHamilton3.750.2152
TXFocused Care at HumbleHumble3.240.3732
TXFocused Care at Sherman Abuse, 1 starSherman3.490.3512
TXFocused Care at AllenbrookBaytown3.120.1852
TXFocused Care at BeechnutHouston3.050.1921
TXFocused Care at Clarksville AbuseClarksville2.790.3832
TXFocused Care at LamesaLamesa2.740.3331
TXFocused Care at Summer Place 1 starBeaumont2.850.1311

1–20 of 25

Methodology

This dashboard uses CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) data (2017–2025), along with other public datasets (Provider Information, Affiliated Entity). State staffing standards via MACPAC (2022).

Metrics

  • Hours Per Resident Day (HPRD): Total staff hours ÷ average residents. Example: 350 hours for 100 residents = 3.5 HPRD.
  • Direct Care (excl. Admin, DON): Hours per resident day for direct care staff only (RN, LPN, CNA, NAtrn, MedAide), excluding administrative and supervisory roles.
  • Contract Staff %: Share of hours provided by contract staff.
  • Census: Average number of residents during the period.

Note: Some states set minimums (e.g., NJ, CA, NY at 3.5 HPRD); a federal 3.48 minimum was recently overturned (2025). A 2001 federal study linked 4.1 HPRD to better outcomes in that study. Staffing needs vary by resident acuity (case-mix), day, and shift. Estimates on PBJ Takeaway assume roughly 60% of staff are CNAs.

Data transparency

The PBJ Dashboard pulls directly from CMS data and is carefully vetted for accuracy. Still, sometimes a bug sneaks into the jelly. That could mean: a systemic CMS data reporting issue (e.g., Q2 2017 contract staffing, missing data in 2020 due to COVID) or there could be a coding error on our part. If you spot something that looks off, please let me know via the contact form so I can set things right.

Request custom PBJ analysis for litigation and investigative reporting.Request custom PBJ analysis.