Cantex Continuing Care

Phoebe J
PBJ Takeaway: Cantex Continuing Care

38 Facilities2 States95% For-ProfitAvg. Overall Rating: 3.0Avg. Staffing Rating: 1.9Staffing Rating: 1.9

Cantex Continuing Care operates 38 nursing homes across 2 states, with 95% classified as for-profit. Its average CMS overall rating is 3.0 stars.

Across the portfolio, facilities report an average of 3.30 total nurse HPRD, including 0.40 RN hours, below the national ratio of 3.77 HPRD.

16% of Cantex Continuing Care facilities meet PBJ320 high-riskPBJ320 assigns nursing homes as high-risk when CMS designates them as: Special Focus Facility (SFF), SFF candidate, 1-star overall rating, or with an abuse icon. criteria (e.g. special focus facility, one-star overall, abuse icon). CMS reports a total of 55 fines ($1.8 million) for the chain's nursing homes.

320 Consulting
Cantex Continuing Care Key Metrics
Providers
38
States
2
Avg. Rating
3.0
Total Fines
$1.8 million
High-Risk FacilitiesPBJ320 assigns nursing homes as high-risk when CMS designates them as: Special Focus Facility (SFF), SFF candidate, 1-star overall rating, or with an abuse icon. – Cantex Continuing Care
Special Focus Facilities (SFFs)
0
SFF Candidates
2
1-Star Overall
2
Cited for Abuse
6
Avg. CMS 5-Star Rating – Cantex Continuing Care
Overall
3.0
Health Inspection
2.6
Staffing
1.9
Quality Measures
4.5
Cantex Continuing Care Facilities

Nursing homes affiliated with this entity. Latest quarter staffing from CMS PBJ data. Click column headers to sort.

StateProviderCityTotal HPRDRN HPRDOverall RatingStaffing Rating
LASt Joseph Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation 1 starMonroe3.360.2511
TXCoronado at Stone OakSan Antonio3.420.5343
TXThe Belmont at Twin CreeksAllen3.200.5142
TXThe Carlyle at Stonebridge ParkSouthlake3.310.4832
TXSan RemoRichardson3.240.7042
TXSolera at West HoustonHouston3.420.4522
TXThe Harrison at HeritageFort Worth3.360.3742
TXThe Crescent Abuse, SFF CandidateSugar Land3.570.7822
TXBel Air at TeravistaRound Rock3.370.6144
TXThe Broadmoor at Creekside ParkThe Woodlands3.540.5832
TXMagnolia ManorGroves3.310.2232
TXHollymeadFlower Mound3.420.4733
TXSorrentoSan Antonio3.220.4321
TXWindemere at Westover HillsSan Antonio3.430.6032
TXPalomino PlaceMesquite3.510.3122
TXCarraraPlano3.530.4842
TXBonne ViePort Arthur3.510.3153
TXPark Valley Inn Health Center AbuseRound Rock3.160.3121
TXThe Colonnades at Reflection Bay SFF CandidatePearland3.350.4822
TXPrairie EstatesFrisco3.360.4131
TXThe Madison on MarshCarrollton3.280.5231
TXCrestview CourtCedar Hill3.380.3831
TXRiverside OaksVictoria3.050.4752
TXWindsor GardensLancaster3.410.3531
TXWoodville Health and Rehabilitation CenterWoodville3.180.3542
TXPalma RealMathis2.950.2741
TXMill Creek 1 starSilsbee3.220.2711
TXOakwood Manor Nursing HomeVidor3.230.3352
TXThe Manor at SeagovilleSeagoville2.950.4422
TXAshford GardensHouston3.210.3542
TXRenaissance Care CenterGainesville3.100.4321
TXLaurel CourtAlvin3.090.4222
TXBeacon HillDenison3.270.5252
TXLarkspurLufkin3.400.6242
TXThe Bradford at BrooksideLivingston3.390.3742
TXFort Bend Healthcare CenterRosenberg3.220.4832
TXThe Villa at Mountain ViewDallas3.300.5023
TXSundance Inn Health Center AbuseNew Braunfels3.750.5232

1–20 of 38

Methodology

This dashboard uses CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) data (2017–2025), along with other public datasets (Provider Information, Affiliated Entity). State staffing standards via MACPAC (2022).

Metrics

  • Hours Per Resident Day (HPRD): Total staff hours ÷ average residents. Example: 350 hours for 100 residents = 3.5 HPRD.
  • Direct Care (excl. Admin, DON): Hours per resident day for direct care staff only (RN, LPN, CNA, NAtrn, MedAide), excluding administrative and supervisory roles.
  • Contract Staff %: Share of hours provided by contract staff.
  • Census: Average number of residents during the period.

Note: Some states set minimums (e.g., NJ, CA, NY at 3.5 HPRD); a federal 3.48 minimum was recently overturned (2025). A 2001 federal study linked 4.1 HPRD to better outcomes in that study. Staffing needs vary by resident acuity (case-mix), day, and shift. Estimates on PBJ Takeaway assume roughly 60% of staff are CNAs.

Data transparency

The PBJ Dashboard pulls directly from CMS data and is carefully vetted for accuracy. Still, sometimes a bug sneaks into the jelly. That could mean: a systemic CMS data reporting issue (e.g., Q2 2017 contract staffing, missing data in 2020 due to COVID) or there could be a coding error on our part. If you spot something that looks off, please let me know via the contact form so I can set things right.

Request custom PBJ analysis for litigation and investigative reporting.Request custom PBJ analysis.